Home/Case Law/Acosta v. Popular
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Acosta v. Popular

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Plaintiff, a field technician employed by International Security Design, Ltd., sustained injuries from a fall off a ladder while installing a key box at Banco Popular. He initiated a lawsuit asserting claims under Labor Law §§ 200, 240 (1), and 241 (6). The Supreme Court initially denied the bank's motion for partial summary judgment on all claims. On appeal, the court affirmed the denial regarding the Labor Law § 200 claim, citing a material issue of fact. However, the appellate court reversed the Supreme Court's decision on the Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) claims, ruling that the installation of a key box constituted routine maintenance, not a protected activity like 'altering' or 'construction' under those specific statutes. Consequently, these particular claims were dismissed.

Acosta v. Popular is a workers' compensation case decided in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Plaintiff, a field technician employed by International Security Design, Ltd., sustained injuries from a fall off a ladder while installing a key box at Banco Popular. He initiated a lawsuit asserting claims under Labor Law §§ 200, 240 (1), and 241 (6). The Supreme Court initially denied the bank's motion for partial summary judgment on all claims. On appeal, the court affirmed the denial regarding the Labor Law § 200 claim, citing a material issue of fact. However, the appellate court reversed the Supreme Court's decision on the Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) claims, ruling that the installation of a key box constituted routine maintenance, not a protected activity like 'altering' or 'construction' under those specific statutes. Consequently, these particular claims were dismissed.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Acosta v. Popular workers compensation case in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Acosta v. Popular case law summary from Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Acosta v. Popular Case Analysis

Acosta v. Popular is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.