Home/Case Law/Action Electrical Contractors Co. v. Goldin
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Action Electrical Contractors Co. v. Goldin

New York Court of Appeals
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

This appeal addresses a contractor's obligation to provide supplemental fringe benefits under Labor Law § 220 for public works projects. Petitioner, Action Electrical Contractors Co., Inc., was charged by the Comptroller of New York City for failing to provide prevailing supplemental benefits. The core issue was whether cash payments directly to employees could fulfill this obligation, rather than solely providing equivalent in-kind benefits. The Court of Appeals reversed the Appellate Division, ruling that the Comptroller's interpretation prohibiting cash substitutes was arbitrary. The court concluded that legislative intent focused on equalizing minimum labor costs, which is satisfied by cash payments equivalent to the cost of prevailing supplements, and thus, the petitioner had complied with the law.

Action Electrical Contractors Co. v. Goldin is a workers' compensation case decided in New York Court of Appeals. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in New York Court of Appeals.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This appeal addresses a contractor's obligation to provide supplemental fringe benefits under Labor Law § 220 for public works projects. Petitioner, Action Electrical Contractors Co., Inc., was charged by the Comptroller of New York City for failing to provide prevailing supplemental benefits. The core issue was whether cash payments directly to employees could fulfill this obligation, rather than solely providing equivalent in-kind benefits. The Court of Appeals reversed the Appellate Division, ruling that the Comptroller's interpretation prohibiting cash substitutes was arbitrary. The court concluded that legislative intent focused on equalizing minimum labor costs, which is satisfied by cash payments equivalent to the cost of prevailing supplements, and thus, the petitioner had complied with the law.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Action Electrical Contractors Co. v. Goldin workers compensation case in New York Court of Appeals. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Action Electrical Contractors Co. v. Goldin case law summary from New York Court of Appeals. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Action Electrical Contractors Co. v. Goldin Case Analysis

Action Electrical Contractors Co. v. Goldin is a legal case related to workers' compensation in New York Court of Appeals. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.