Home/Case Law/Adam Xiong vs. BINGO GROCERIES, NorGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY by GUARD INSURANCE GROUP
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Adam Xiong vs. BINGO GROCERIES, NorGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY by GUARD INSURANCE GROUP

Filed: Oct 03, 2016
Fremont
ADJ9955143

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a workers' compensation applicant seeking reconsideration of an award for temporary total disability (TTD) benefits. The applicant argued that a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) opined he remained temporarily disabled beyond the period determined by the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ). The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct a clerical error in the date of injury. However, they affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding the primary treating physician's reports constituted substantial evidence that the applicant's TTD benefits terminated on May 13, 2015, as the QME's report lacked sufficient reasoning to overturn this finding.

Adam Xiong vs. BINGO GROCERIES, NorGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY by GUARD INSURANCE GROUP is a workers' compensation case decided in Fremont. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Fremont.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a workers' compensation applicant seeking reconsideration of an award for temporary total disability (TTD) benefits. The applicant argued that a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) opined he remained temporarily disabled beyond the period determined by the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ). The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct a clerical error in the date of injury. However, they affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding the primary treating physician's reports constituted substantial evidence that the applicant's TTD benefits terminated on May 13, 2015, as the QME's report lacked sufficient reasoning to overturn this finding.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Adam Xiong vs. BINGO GROCERIES, NorGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY by GUARD INSURANCE GROUP workers compensation case in Fremont. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Adam Xiong vs. BINGO GROCERIES, NorGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY by GUARD INSURANCE GROUP case law summary from Fremont. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Adam Xiong vs. BINGO GROCERIES, NorGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY by GUARD INSURANCE GROUP Case Analysis

Adam Xiong vs. BINGO GROCERIES, NorGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY by GUARD INSURANCE GROUP is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Fremont. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.