Home/Case Law/African Grant vs. Washington Redskins, Hartford Insurance Company
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

African Grant vs. Washington Redskins, Hartford Insurance Company

Filed: Oct 17, 2013
Santa Ana
ADJ8075069

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by the Washington Redskins and their insurer, Hartford Insurance Company, concerning a workers' compensation award. The petition was dismissed because it was filed beyond the statutory 25-day deadline after the initial Findings and Award were issued. Even if considered on its merits, the Board would have denied reconsideration based on the provided report and recommendation. The Judge's report details that the applicant, African Grant, sustained a cumulative trauma injury over his football career, and the dismissal was based solely on the untimeliness of the petition.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by the Washington Redskins and their insurer, Hartford Insurance Company, concerning a workers' compensation award. The petition was dismissed because it was filed beyond the statutory 25-day deadline after the initial Findings and Award were issued. Even if considered on its merits, the Board would have denied reconsideration based on the provided report and recommendation. The Judge's report details that the applicant, African Grant, sustained a cumulative trauma injury over his football career, and the dismissal was based solely on the untimeliness of the petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

African Grant vs. Washington Redskins, Hartford Insurance Company (2013) – Santa Ana | CompFox