CompFox AI Summary
This case involves an applicant alleging injury to her left foot and ankle. The defendant contested the finding of industrial injury, arguing it lacked substantial evidence and was a post-termination claim. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, affirming the original finding of industrial injury. The Board found sufficient evidence of prior medical records and credible testimony to trigger an exception to the post-termination rule. Finally, the Board deferred the issue of cumulative trauma and awarded further medical treatment.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves an applicant alleging injury to her left foot and ankle. The defendant contested the finding of industrial injury, arguing it lacked substantial evidence and was a post-termination claim. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, affirming the original finding of industrial injury. The Board found sufficient evidence of prior medical records and credible testimony to trigger an exception to the post-termination rule. Finally, the Board deferred the issue of cumulative trauma and awarded further medical treatment.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.