CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a decision awarding lumbar fusion surgery, finding the WCJ erred by solely relying on the Cervantes decision regarding timely utilization review. The Board determined that the defendant's utilization review timeliness was unclear, and the parties had agreed to an Agreed Medical Examiner (AME) to resolve the surgery dispute before Cervantes was issued. Furthermore, the Board held that the treating physician's recommendation for surgery must constitute substantial evidence, which was not definitively established here. Therefore, the matter was returned for further development of the record, requiring the treating physician to address the AME's concerns regarding the necessity of fusion surgery.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a decision awarding lumbar fusion surgery, finding the WCJ erred by solely relying on the Cervantes decision regarding timely utilization review. The Board determined that the defendant's utilization review timeliness was unclear, and the parties had agreed to an Agreed Medical Examiner (AME) to resolve the surgery dispute before Cervantes was issued. Furthermore, the Board held that the treating physician's recommendation for surgery must constitute substantial evidence, which was not definitively established here. Therefore, the matter was returned for further development of the record, requiring the treating physician to address the AME's concerns regarding the necessity of fusion surgery.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.