CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the employer's petition for reconsideration in the case of Alexander Golis v. Pactiv Corp. The WCAB adopted the findings of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) that neither Dr. Kettner's nor Dr. Anderson's apportionment opinions constituted substantial evidence. Consequently, the employer failed to meet its burden of proving apportionment for the applicant's post-traumatic stress disorder.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the employer's petition for reconsideration in the case of Alexander Golis v. Pactiv Corp. The WCAB adopted the findings of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) that neither Dr. Kettner's nor Dr. Anderson's apportionment opinions constituted substantial evidence. Consequently, the employer failed to meet its burden of proving apportionment for the applicant's post-traumatic stress disorder.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.