CompFox AI Summary
Defendant Superior Grocers sought reconsideration of an approved Compromise and Release for applicant's claimed injuries. They argued the settlement failed to name all employers, did not account for prior disability payments, and omitted a fee hold for attorney splits. The Board dismissed the petition as premature because a trial is scheduled for May 22, 2019, where these issues can be properly addressed with evidence and testimony. Therefore, the Board found it lacked sufficient information to rule on the reconsideration request at this time.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Defendant Superior Grocers sought reconsideration of an approved Compromise and Release for applicant's claimed injuries. They argued the settlement failed to name all employers, did not account for prior disability payments, and omitted a fee hold for attorney splits. The Board dismissed the petition as premature because a trial is scheduled for May 22, 2019, where these issues can be properly addressed with evidence and testimony. Therefore, the Board found it lacked sufficient information to rule on the reconsideration request at this time.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.