CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a worker's claim that she was denied medical care, thus allowing her to seek treatment outside her employer's network. The applicant's attorney argued that the employer failed to provide authorization for treatment with a network physician. However, the Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) found that the employer had provided timely authorization, evidenced by a fax confirmation and proof of service, and that the applicant's claim of non-receipt was insufficient to rebut the presumption of delivery. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) reviewed the petition for reconsideration, adopted the WCJ's reasoning, and affirmed the original findings. Therefore, the WCAB upheld the decision that the applicant did not prove a denial of care.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a worker's claim that she was denied medical care, thus allowing her to seek treatment outside her employer's network. The applicant's attorney argued that the employer failed to provide authorization for treatment with a network physician. However, the Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) found that the employer had provided timely authorization, evidenced by a fax confirmation and proof of service, and that the applicant's claim of non-receipt was insufficient to rebut the presumption of delivery. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) reviewed the petition for reconsideration, adopted the WCJ's reasoning, and affirmed the original findings. Therefore, the WCAB upheld the decision that the applicant did not prove a denial of care.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.