Home/Case Law/Alicia Prado vs. FOODSCO; dba RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, SEDGWICK CLAIM
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Alicia Prado vs. FOODSCO; dba RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, SEDGWICK CLAIM

Filed: May 27, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ7113676; ADJ7331802

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a worker claiming industrial injuries on two dates, December 24, 2009, and June 3, 2010, both of which were initially denied by the WCJ. The applicant sought reconsideration, arguing substantial evidence supported her claims and highlighting issues with evidence evaluation and potential defendant misconduct. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, adopted the WCJ's reasoning for affirming the original decision, but ordered corrections to clerical errors in the Minutes of Hearing concerning the applicant's date of hire and marital status.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a worker claiming industrial injuries on two dates, December 24, 2009, and June 3, 2010, both of which were initially denied by the WCJ. The applicant sought reconsideration, arguing substantial evidence supported her claims and highlighting issues with evidence evaluation and potential defendant misconduct. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, adopted the WCJ's reasoning for affirming the original decision, but ordered corrections to clerical errors in the Minutes of Hearing concerning the applicant's date of hire and marital status.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.