CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has granted reconsideration, on its own motion, of a prior order denying the applicant's petition for reconsideration in the case of Alma Lopez Castaneda vs. Forever 21. This action is taken to allow for further study of the legal and factual issues involved. All subsequent correspondence and filings related to this reconsideration must be submitted directly to the Appeals Board Commissioners in San Francisco, not to district offices or via e-filing. Trial-level documents unrelated to the petition for reconsideration will continue to be filed through EAMS.
ALMA LOPEZ CASTANEDA vs. FOREVER 21, NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE, BROADSPIRE is a workers' compensation case decided in Los Angeles. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Los Angeles.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has granted reconsideration, on its own motion, of a prior order denying the applicant's petition for reconsideration in the case of Alma Lopez Castaneda vs. Forever 21. This action is taken to allow for further study of the legal and factual issues involved. All subsequent correspondence and filings related to this reconsideration must be submitted directly to the Appeals Board Commissioners in San Francisco, not to district offices or via e-filing. Trial-level documents unrelated to the petition for reconsideration will continue to be filed through EAMS.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.