Home/Case Law/AMADO GATICA vs. COUNTY LINE FRAMING, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES
Regular DecisionOrder Dismissing Petition

AMADO GATICA vs. COUNTY LINE FRAMING, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES

Filed: Feb 11, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ6429650

CompFox AI Summary

This order dismisses the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final interlocutory order that did not determine substantive rights. The petition for removal is also denied, as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Appeals Board will consider the petition timely filed due to a delay in its processing. Consequently, the Petition for Reconsideration is dismissed and removal is denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This order dismisses the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final interlocutory order that did not determine substantive rights. The petition for removal is also denied, as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Appeals Board will consider the petition timely filed due to a delay in its processing. Consequently, the Petition for Reconsideration is dismissed and removal is denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

AMADO GATICA vs. COUNTY LINE FRAMING, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox