Home/Case Law/AMBER DRISCOLL vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Permissibly Self-Insured
Regular DecisionReconsideration

AMBER DRISCOLL vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Permissibly Self-Insured

Filed: Oct 03, 2008
ADJ269708 (VNO 0375110), ADJ3584816 (VNO 0375111), ADJ2252286 (VNO 0397337), ADJ944476 (VNO 0552164)

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's four separate awards, rescinded them, and returned the case for further proceedings. The decision was based on deficiencies in the record, specifically the failure to create an adequate record that clearly outlines submitted issues, stipulations, and admitted evidence, as required by Hamilton v. Lockheed. Consequently, the Appeals Board cannot ascertain the basis of the original decision and remands the matter for proper record development and a new ruling by the WCJ.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's four separate awards, rescinded them, and returned the case for further proceedings. The decision was based on deficiencies in the record, specifically the failure to create an adequate record that clearly outlines submitted issues, stipulations, and admitted evidence, as required by Hamilton v. Lockheed. Consequently, the Appeals Board cannot ascertain the basis of the original decision and remands the matter for proper record development and a new ruling by the WCJ.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.