Home/Case Law/ANA ROMERO vs. FULLERTON FOODS, BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ANA ROMERO vs. FULLERTON FOODS, BROADSPIRE

Filed: Sep 16, 2014
ADJ942502; ADJ1222768; ADJ1116380

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an award of permanent and total disability to Ana Romero. The Board adopted the judge's report, which found substantial evidence in the opinion of an agreed medical examiner, Dr. Stalberg, who concluded the applicant was unable to work. The defendants' contention that Dr. Stalberg's opinion was unreliable due to applicant's functional capacity evaluation efforts was unpersuasive, as AMEs are presumed to be neutral experts.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an award of permanent and total disability to Ana Romero. The Board adopted the judge's report, which found substantial evidence in the opinion of an agreed medical examiner, Dr. Stalberg, who concluded the applicant was unable to work. The defendants' contention that Dr. Stalberg's opinion was unreliable due to applicant's functional capacity evaluation efforts was unpersuasive, as AMEs are presumed to be neutral experts.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ANA ROMERO vs. FULLERTON FOODS, BROADSPIRE (2014) – | CompFox