Home/Case Law/ANGELA CONTRERAS vs. CENTRAL CALIFORNIA CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES/STAR INSURANCE COMPANY, ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE AGENCY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ANGELA CONTRERAS vs. CENTRAL CALIFORNIA CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES/STAR INSURANCE COMPANY, ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE AGENCY

Filed: Mar 05, 2019
Stockton
ADJ10387780

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the original decision, and returned the case to the WCJ for further proceedings. The original decision denied the applicant's claim for bilateral knee injury AOE/COE. This decision was based on conflicting medical opinions from Dr. Achackzad regarding whether the applicant's current knee symptoms were due to a prior specific injury or subsequent cumulative trauma. The Board found Dr. Achackzad's testimony lacked substantial evidence due to inconsistencies and ordered the record to be further developed.

ANGELA CONTRERAS vs. CENTRAL CALIFORNIA CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES/STAR INSURANCE COMPANY, ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE AGENCY is a workers' compensation case decided in Stockton. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Stockton.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the original decision, and returned the case to the WCJ for further proceedings. The original decision denied the applicant's claim for bilateral knee injury AOE/COE. This decision was based on conflicting medical opinions from Dr. Achackzad regarding whether the applicant's current knee symptoms were due to a prior specific injury or subsequent cumulative trauma. The Board found Dr. Achackzad's testimony lacked substantial evidence due to inconsistencies and ordered the record to be further developed.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ANGELA CONTRERAS vs. CENTRAL CALIFORNIA CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES/STAR INSURANCE COMPANY, ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE AGENCY workers compensation case in Stockton. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ANGELA CONTRERAS vs. CENTRAL CALIFORNIA CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES/STAR INSURANCE COMPANY, ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE AGENCY case law summary from Stockton. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ANGELA CONTRERAS vs. CENTRAL CALIFORNIA CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES/STAR INSURANCE COMPANY, ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE AGENCY Case Analysis

ANGELA CONTRERAS vs. CENTRAL CALIFORNIA CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES/STAR INSURANCE COMPANY, ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE AGENCY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Stockton. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.