CompFox AI Summary
This case involves two petitions for reconsideration by defendants Chubb and Continental concerning separate workers' compensation awards. Chubb sought reconsideration of an award holding it solely liable for an applicant's knee and back injuries, arguing TIG Insurance was also responsible. Continental contested being ordered to administer a claim, asserting another defendant held greater exposure. The Board denied Continental's petition, but for Chubb, it returned the case for further proceedings to address its claim of shared liability with TIG.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves two petitions for reconsideration by defendants Chubb and Continental concerning separate workers' compensation awards. Chubb sought reconsideration of an award holding it solely liable for an applicant's knee and back injuries, arguing TIG Insurance was also responsible. Continental contested being ordered to administer a claim, asserting another defendant held greater exposure. The Board denied Continental's petition, but for Chubb, it returned the case for further proceedings to address its claim of shared liability with TIG.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.