CompFox AI Summary
The Applicant sought reconsideration of a prior denial of his employer's petition, which had challenged a finding of $100%$ permanent disability reduced by $10%$ apportionment. The Applicant's new petition argued a substantial change in his medical condition, becoming paraplegic after the prior decisions, and also that the initial $90%$ rating was an error. The Board denied the Applicant's petition, finding he was not aggrieved by the prior order and that the alleged new medical condition was a subsequent intervening event, not grounds for reconsideration.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Applicant sought reconsideration of a prior denial of his employer's petition, which had challenged a finding of $100%$ permanent disability reduced by $10%$ apportionment. The Applicant's new petition argued a substantial change in his medical condition, becoming paraplegic after the prior decisions, and also that the initial $90%$ rating was an error. The Board denied the Applicant's petition, finding he was not aggrieved by the prior order and that the alleged new medical condition was a subsequent intervening event, not grounds for reconsideration.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.