CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's finding that she did not sustain a cumulative injury. This decision was based on the Qualified Medical Examiner's (QME) report, which was deemed substantial evidence. The QME found the applicant to be a poor historian with exaggerated symptoms and lacking objective findings to support her claims. The Board found the applicant's treating physician's report insufficient due to an inaccurate understanding of job duties.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's finding that she did not sustain a cumulative injury. This decision was based on the Qualified Medical Examiner's (QME) report, which was deemed substantial evidence. The QME found the applicant to be a poor historian with exaggerated symptoms and lacking objective findings to support her claims. The Board found the applicant's treating physician's report insufficient due to an inaccurate understanding of job duties.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.