CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the finding that the applicant suffered a compensable psychiatric injury. The Appeals Board adopted the Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) report, giving it great weight due to the opportunity to observe witness demeanor. The WCJ found that actual employment events, including sexual harassment, a YouTube video incident, classroom heat issues, and administrative failures, were predominant in causing the applicant's psychiatric injury, outweighing any good faith personnel actions. Medical evidence from a QME further supported that the applicant's symptoms stemmed from this stressful work environment.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the finding that the applicant suffered a compensable psychiatric injury. The Appeals Board adopted the Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) report, giving it great weight due to the opportunity to observe witness demeanor. The WCJ found that actual employment events, including sexual harassment, a YouTube video incident, classroom heat issues, and administrative failures, were predominant in causing the applicant's psychiatric injury, outweighing any good faith personnel actions. Medical evidence from a QME further supported that the applicant's symptoms stemmed from this stressful work environment.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.