Home/Case Law/ARTHUR LUCERO vs. CITY OF FRESNO, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by AMERICAN ALL RISK LOSS ADMINISTRATORS
Regular Decision

ARTHUR LUCERO vs. CITY OF FRESNO, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by AMERICAN ALL RISK LOSS ADMINISTRATORS

Filed: Nov 08, 2012
Fresno
ADJ7651955

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a dispute over the selection of a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) panelist in a workers' compensation claim. The applicant sought to remove Dr. Arora, arguing the defendant's notice to strike Dr. Cayton was insufficient. The applicant, a firefighter, alleged a heart and hernia injury. The Appeals Board denied the petition, agreeing with the WCJ that the defendant's notice of intent to strike was sufficient and timely under Labor Code section 4062.2(c).

ARTHUR LUCERO vs. CITY OF FRESNO, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by AMERICAN ALL RISK LOSS ADMINISTRATORS is a workers' compensation case decided in Fresno. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Fresno.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a dispute over the selection of a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) panelist in a workers' compensation claim. The applicant sought to remove Dr. Arora, arguing the defendant's notice to strike Dr. Cayton was insufficient. The applicant, a firefighter, alleged a heart and hernia injury. The Appeals Board denied the petition, agreeing with the WCJ that the defendant's notice of intent to strike was sufficient and timely under Labor Code section 4062.2(c).

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ARTHUR LUCERO vs. CITY OF FRESNO, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by AMERICAN ALL RISK LOSS ADMINISTRATORS workers compensation case in Fresno. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ARTHUR LUCERO vs. CITY OF FRESNO, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by AMERICAN ALL RISK LOSS ADMINISTRATORS case law summary from Fresno. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ARTHUR LUCERO vs. CITY OF FRESNO, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by AMERICAN ALL RISK LOSS ADMINISTRATORS Case Analysis

ARTHUR LUCERO vs. CITY OF FRESNO, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by AMERICAN ALL RISK LOSS ADMINISTRATORS is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Fresno. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ARTHUR LUCERO vs. CITY OF FRESNO, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by AMERICAN ALL RISK LOSS ADMINISTRATORS (2012) – Fresno | CompFox | CompFox