Home/Case Law/ARTHUR VASQUEZ vs. GUARD SYSTEMS, CLAIMQUEST WALNUT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ARTHUR VASQUEZ vs. GUARD SYSTEMS, CLAIMQUEST WALNUT

Filed: Dec 27, 2013
Anaheim
ADJ8644013

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration of an order finding no injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment. The Board adopted the judge's report, which detailed numerous inconsistencies in the applicant's testimony regarding the injury, prior medical history, and work activity. These credibility issues, supported by conflicting deposition and trial testimony, as well as documentary evidence, were the basis for the judge's determination that the applicant failed to meet their evidentiary burden.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration of an order finding no injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment. The Board adopted the judge's report, which detailed numerous inconsistencies in the applicant's testimony regarding the injury, prior medical history, and work activity. These credibility issues, supported by conflicting deposition and trial testimony, as well as documentary evidence, were the basis for the judge's determination that the applicant failed to meet their evidentiary burden.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.