CompFox AI Summary
In this workers' compensation case, the applicant claimed industrial injury to his back, right shoulder, and feet/ankles. The WCJ initially found no industrial injury and ordered that the applicant take nothing. The applicant sought reconsideration, arguing he did sustain an injury and that the WCJ's credibility determination was incorrect, citing a doctor's report. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration but ultimately affirmed the WCJ's original decision, adopting the WCJ's report. Therefore, the applicant's claim was denied.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In this workers' compensation case, the applicant claimed industrial injury to his back, right shoulder, and feet/ankles. The WCJ initially found no industrial injury and ordered that the applicant take nothing. The applicant sought reconsideration, arguing he did sustain an injury and that the WCJ's credibility determination was incorrect, citing a doctor's report. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration but ultimately affirmed the WCJ's original decision, adopting the WCJ's report. Therefore, the applicant's claim was denied.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.