Home/Case Law/Barbara Miljkovic vs. Southern California Edison
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Barbara Miljkovic vs. Southern California Edison

Filed: Jul 06, 2015
Marina Del Rey
ADJ7219585

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Barbara Miljkovic's petition for reconsideration, affirming the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) decision. The Board found no industrial injury from alleged asbestos exposure, based on medical reports showing no evidence of asbestos-induced lung disease. Furthermore, the Board determined that Miljkovic's psychiatric injury was barred by Labor Code Section 3208.3(h) because the employer's personnel actions, while potentially harsh, were lawful, non-discriminatory, and conducted in good faith. The Board clarified that good faith personnel actions constituted 50% of the cause of the psychiatric injury, consistent with case law.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Barbara Miljkovic's petition for reconsideration, affirming the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) decision. The Board found no industrial injury from alleged asbestos exposure, based on medical reports showing no evidence of asbestos-induced lung disease. Furthermore, the Board determined that Miljkovic's psychiatric injury was barred by Labor Code Section 3208.3(h) because the employer's personnel actions, while potentially harsh, were lawful, non-discriminatory, and conducted in good faith. The Board clarified that good faith personnel actions constituted 50% of the cause of the psychiatric injury, consistent with case law.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.