CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior award finding applicant sustained an industrial injury to his face and eyes and was entitled to cataract surgery. The Board found the defendant did not timely communicate its Utilization Review denial, rendering it invalid, but determined further medical evidence was needed to establish the surgery's industrial causation and medical necessity. The Board rescinded the original award and returned the matter for further proceedings to develop the record on these specific issues. A dissenting opinion argued the defendant waived the causation objection and that the treating physician's report constituted substantial medical evidence supporting the surgery.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior award finding applicant sustained an industrial injury to his face and eyes and was entitled to cataract surgery. The Board found the defendant did not timely communicate its Utilization Review denial, rendering it invalid, but determined further medical evidence was needed to establish the surgery's industrial causation and medical necessity. The Board rescinded the original award and returned the matter for further proceedings to develop the record on these specific issues. A dissenting opinion argued the defendant waived the causation objection and that the treating physician's report constituted substantial medical evidence supporting the surgery.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.