Home/Case Law/BEATRICE SYWASSINK vs. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

BEATRICE SYWASSINK vs. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

Filed: Apr 25, 2017
Stockton
ADJ7296817

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior decision denying Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) claim for credit against Beatrice Sywassink's National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) award. The Board found that the NVICP, designed as a no-fault system, expressly prohibits compensation for expenses already covered by state compensation programs like workers' compensation. Allowing PG&E a credit would frustrate the intent of the federal program and potentially violate the Supremacy Clause. Furthermore, PG&E lacked standing to pursue a claim under the NVICP itself, and the program, not PG&E, holds subrogation rights to prevent double recovery.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior decision denying Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) claim for credit against Beatrice Sywassink's National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) award. The Board found that the NVICP, designed as a no-fault system, expressly prohibits compensation for expenses already covered by state compensation programs like workers' compensation. Allowing PG&E a credit would frustrate the intent of the federal program and potentially violate the Supremacy Clause. Furthermore, PG&E lacked standing to pursue a claim under the NVICP itself, and the program, not PG&E, holds subrogation rights to prevent double recovery.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

BEATRICE SYWASSINK vs. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (2017) – Stockton | CompFox