Home/Case Law/BENIOIT PARISE vs. PERKINELMER OPTOELECTRONICS, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionRemoval Petition

BENIOIT PARISE vs. PERKINELMER OPTOELECTRONICS, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Apr 23, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ1797960 (SAC 0368274)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Liberty Mutual Insurance Company's petition for removal, upholding an earlier order that rejoined Liberty and its insured, Perkinelmer Optoelectronics, as parties. Although Liberty was previously dismissed, the WCAB found good cause to rescind that dismissal under Labor Code section 5803. This was because the applicant amended their claim to allege cumulative trauma extending to June 1, 2004, making Perkinelmer a potentially liable employer. The WCAB determined that Liberty's initial dismissal petition was based on facts no longer operative after the amendment, and a final determination of liability had not yet been made.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Liberty Mutual Insurance Company's petition for removal, upholding an earlier order that rejoined Liberty and its insured, Perkinelmer Optoelectronics, as parties. Although Liberty was previously dismissed, the WCAB found good cause to rescind that dismissal under Labor Code section 5803. This was because the applicant amended their claim to allege cumulative trauma extending to June 1, 2004, making Perkinelmer a potentially liable employer. The WCAB determined that Liberty's initial dismissal petition was based on facts no longer operative after the amendment, and a final determination of liability had not yet been made.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.