Home/Case Law/Bernard Durazo vs. ANTELOPE VALLEY HOSPITAL, ALPHA FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Bernard Durazo vs. ANTELOPE VALLEY HOSPITAL, ALPHA FUND

Filed: Jan 06, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ3024777 (VNO 0554063) ADJ3354319 (VNO 0554059)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The WCAB affirmed the trial judge's decision to rely on the applicant's treating physicians' reports over the Panel Qualified Medical Evaluators (PQMEs). This reliance was based on the principle that the WCAB, as the trier-of-fact, is not bound by PQME opinions but must give them consideration. The WCAB found no error in prioritizing credible and well-reasoned medical opinions that addressed all aspects of the claimed injuries, even if from treating physicians.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The WCAB affirmed the trial judge's decision to rely on the applicant's treating physicians' reports over the Panel Qualified Medical Evaluators (PQMEs). This reliance was based on the principle that the WCAB, as the trier-of-fact, is not bound by PQME opinions but must give them consideration. The WCAB found no error in prioritizing credible and well-reasoned medical opinions that addressed all aspects of the claimed injuries, even if from treating physicians.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.