Home/Case Law/BETTY DOVE vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

BETTY DOVE vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

Filed: Jul 01, 2016
Van Nuys
ADJ9305394

CompFox AI Summary

In Betty Dove v. City of Los Angeles, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (WCJ), who determined that the applicant's employment was not the predominant cause of her alleged psychiatric injury. The WCJ's credibility determination, based on observing witness demeanor, was given great weight and was not overcome by substantial contrary evidence. Therefore, the Board found no "actual event of employment" to support the claim, as required by Labor Code §3208.3.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In Betty Dove v. City of Los Angeles, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (WCJ), who determined that the applicant's employment was not the predominant cause of her alleged psychiatric injury. The WCJ's credibility determination, based on observing witness demeanor, was given great weight and was not overcome by substantial contrary evidence. Therefore, the Board found no "actual event of employment" to support the claim, as required by Labor Code §3208.3.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.