CompFox AI Summary
The petitioners, corporate entities and Robert F. Kent, sought judicial review under CPLR article 78 of two determinations by the New York State Superintendent of Insurance, both dated March 20, 2002. These determinations revoked the petitioners' licenses to transact insurance business and imposed civil penalties for submitting materially false workers' compensation insurance applications to secure lower premiums. The court found that there was substantial evidence in the record to support the Superintendent's determinations, including the knowing intent to deceive. Consequently, the court confirmed the determinations, denied the petition, and dismissed the proceeding on the merits with costs.
BiCounty Brokerage South Corp. v. State of New York Insurance Department is a workers' compensation case decided in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The petitioners, corporate entities and Robert F. Kent, sought judicial review under CPLR article 78 of two determinations by the New York State Superintendent of Insurance, both dated March 20, 2002. These determinations revoked the petitioners' licenses to transact insurance business and imposed civil penalties for submitting materially false workers' compensation insurance applications to secure lower premiums. The court found that there was substantial evidence in the record to support the Superintendent's determinations, including the knowing intent to deceive. Consequently, the court confirmed the determinations, denied the petition, and dismissed the proceeding on the merits with costs.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.