Home/Case Law/Bomely v. Mid-America Corp.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Bomely v. Mid-America Corp.

Tennessee Supreme Court
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Justice Holder concurs with the majority's decision that permanently and totally disabled employees are entitled to benefits until age 65. However, he dissents from the majority's method of dividing liability between the employer and the Second Injury Fund, arguing it deviates from legislative intent and deters the employment of disabled individuals. He also disagrees with the majority's approach of applying both subsections (a) and (b) of Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-208 in permanent total disability cases. Justice Holder advocates for a clear distinction: subsection (a) should apply when a subsequent injury causes permanent total disability, limiting employer liability to the disability caused by the subsequent injury alone, typically the first 400 weeks. Subsection (b) should apply only when an employee can still work but has combined compensable vocational disabilities exceeding 100 percent. He suggests affirming the trial court's finding of a 20 percent disability under subsection (a) for the employer, with the Second Injury Fund responsible for the remaining benefits until age 65.

Bomely v. Mid-America Corp. is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Supreme Court.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Justice Holder concurs with the majority's decision that permanently and totally disabled employees are entitled to benefits until age 65. However, he dissents from the majority's method of dividing liability between the employer and the Second Injury Fund, arguing it deviates from legislative intent and deters the employment of disabled individuals. He also disagrees with the majority's approach of applying both subsections (a) and (b) of Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-208 in permanent total disability cases. Justice Holder advocates for a clear distinction: subsection (a) should apply when a subsequent injury causes permanent total disability, limiting employer liability to the disability caused by the subsequent injury alone, typically the first 400 weeks. Subsection (b) should apply only when an employee can still work but has combined compensable vocational disabilities exceeding 100 percent. He suggests affirming the trial court's finding of a 20 percent disability under subsection (a) for the employer, with the Second Injury Fund responsible for the remaining benefits until age 65.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Bomely v. Mid-America Corp. workers compensation case in Tennessee Supreme Court. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Bomely v. Mid-America Corp. case law summary from Tennessee Supreme Court. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Bomely v. Mid-America Corp. Case Analysis

Bomely v. Mid-America Corp. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.