Home/Case Law/Brawley, Ronald v. Construct All USA, Inc.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionAppeal from the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

Brawley, Ronald v. Construct All USA, Inc.

Filed: Jul 14, 2022
Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
2020-05-0775

CompFox AI Summary

The employee, Ronald D. Brawley, sustained head, neck, shoulder, and back injuries after being struck by a truck door while working for Construct All USA, Inc. Although the employer accepted the compensability of the initial accident, a dispute arose concerning the need for additional medical treatment, specifically bilateral shoulder surgeries and a cervical spine fusion. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court determined the employee had not presented sufficient evidence to prove these additional medical benefits arose primarily from the work accident. The employee appealed this decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the trial court's order, concluding that the employee failed to meet the burden of proof regarding the primary causation of the needed surgeries and remanded the case.

Brawley, Ronald v. Construct All USA, Inc. is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The employee, Ronald D. Brawley, sustained head, neck, shoulder, and back injuries after being struck by a truck door while working for Construct All USA, Inc. Although the employer accepted the compensability of the initial accident, a dispute arose concerning the need for additional medical treatment, specifically bilateral shoulder surgeries and a cervical spine fusion. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court determined the employee had not presented sufficient evidence to prove these additional medical benefits arose primarily from the work accident. The employee appealed this decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the trial court's order, concluding that the employee failed to meet the burden of proof regarding the primary causation of the needed surgeries and remanded the case.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Brawley, Ronald v. Construct All USA, Inc. workers compensation case in Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Brawley, Ronald v. Construct All USA, Inc. case law summary from Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Brawley, Ronald v. Construct All USA, Inc. Case Analysis

Brawley, Ronald v. Construct All USA, Inc. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.