CompFox AI Summary
The applicant sought reconsideration of an Order Approving Compromise and Release (OACR) for $$28,000.00$ related to back and lower extremity injuries. She argued she would not have settled if she had known her functional capacity test, crucial for her return to work, was approved on the same day as the settlement. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration due to the applicant's allegations and the Board's broad discretion. The OACR was rescinded, and the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings to determine if the stipulations should be set aside.
BRIDGETT LE BOY vs. KAISER PERMANENTE is a workers' compensation case decided in Stockton. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Stockton.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The applicant sought reconsideration of an Order Approving Compromise and Release (OACR) for $$28,000.00$ related to back and lower extremity injuries. She argued she would not have settled if she had known her functional capacity test, crucial for her return to work, was approved on the same day as the settlement. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration due to the applicant's allegations and the Board's broad discretion. The OACR was rescinded, and the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings to determine if the stipulations should be set aside.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.