Home/Case Law/Carlos Valdiviezo vs. The Olympic Club, North River Insurance Company, Crum and Forster
Regular DecisionRemoval

Carlos Valdiviezo vs. The Olympic Club, North River Insurance Company, Crum and Forster

Filed: Aug 09, 2018
San Francisco
ADJ10885532

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for removal. The applicant sought to obtain a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) panel after objecting to a non-Medical Provider Network (MPN) physician's report. However, the Board found that the applicant failed to comply with Labor Code section 4062.2 by not serving the objection on the defendant at least 16 days prior to requesting the QME panel. Consequently, the applicant did not demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and reconsideration was deemed an adequate remedy.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for removal. The applicant sought to obtain a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) panel after objecting to a non-Medical Provider Network (MPN) physician's report. However, the Board found that the applicant failed to comply with Labor Code section 4062.2 by not serving the objection on the defendant at least 16 days prior to requesting the QME panel. Consequently, the applicant did not demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and reconsideration was deemed an adequate remedy.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Carlos Valdiviezo vs. The Olympic Club, North River Insurance Company, Crum and Forster (2018) – San Francisco | CompFox