CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Carmen Parra's petition for reconsideration because it was "skeletal" and improperly served. The petition failed to detail the grounds for reconsideration and lacked specific references to the record and legal principles as required by statute and board rules. Furthermore, the proof of service was defective, as indicated by postmarked mail sent after the purported service date and an incorrect suite number on an envelope. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for these procedural deficiencies.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Carmen Parra's petition for reconsideration because it was "skeletal" and improperly served. The petition failed to detail the grounds for reconsideration and lacked specific references to the record and legal principles as required by statute and board rules. Furthermore, the proof of service was defective, as indicated by postmarked mail sent after the purported service date and an incorrect suite number on an envelope. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for these procedural deficiencies.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.