Home/Case Law/CECILIA MACIAS vs. GOOD SHEPHERD CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CECILIA MACIAS vs. GOOD SHEPHERD CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jun 01, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ988798 (VNO 0472280) ADJ1479665 (VNO 0472281) ADJ2424544 (VNO 0472282) ADJ3975160 (VNO 0472283)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a lien claimant, Wilshire Surgicenter, seeking reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision that disallowed the majority of its $$18,148$ lien claim. Wilshire argued the judge improperly considered the Official Medical Fee Schedule (OMFS) and requested removal due to alleged bias. The WCAB denied reconsideration and removal, affirming that Wilshire failed to meet its burden of proving the reasonableness of its charges, as even its own witness suggested a lower "reasonable" amount. The WCAB also clarified that the judge's decision was based on evidence of unreasonableness, not bias.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a lien claimant, Wilshire Surgicenter, seeking reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision that disallowed the majority of its $$18,148$ lien claim. Wilshire argued the judge improperly considered the Official Medical Fee Schedule (OMFS) and requested removal due to alleged bias. The WCAB denied reconsideration and removal, affirming that Wilshire failed to meet its burden of proving the reasonableness of its charges, as even its own witness suggested a lower "reasonable" amount. The WCAB also clarified that the judge's decision was based on evidence of unreasonableness, not bias.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.