CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not taken from a "final" order, but rather from an interlocutory procedural ruling. The WCAB also denied the Petition for Removal, finding that the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm would result from denial. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's reasoning that the ruling on the court reporter issue was a reasonable solution reconciling the parties' interests. Therefore, the petitions seeking reconsideration and removal were both dismissed and denied.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not taken from a "final" order, but rather from an interlocutory procedural ruling. The WCAB also denied the Petition for Removal, finding that the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm would result from denial. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's reasoning that the ruling on the court reporter issue was a reasonable solution reconciling the parties' interests. Therefore, the petitions seeking reconsideration and removal were both dismissed and denied.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.