Home/Case Law/CHARLENE ADAMS vs. ST. FRANCIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SEDGWICK CMS
Regular DecisionReconsideration Decision

CHARLENE ADAMS vs. ST. FRANCIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SEDGWICK CMS

Filed: Jun 09, 2025
Oakland
ADJ13108823

CompFox AI Summary

Defendant sought reconsideration of an Appeals Board Order and Decision After Reconsideration that had rescinded a WCJ's Findings and Order and remanded the case. The Appeals Board, after reviewing the petition and answer, determined that the petition for reconsideration was filed against a non-final, interlocutory order. Citing Labor Code sections and established precedent regarding finality of orders, the Board concluded that such orders do not determine substantive rights or liabilities and are not subject to reconsideration. Consequently, the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration was dismissed.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Defendant sought reconsideration of an Appeals Board Order and Decision After Reconsideration that had rescinded a WCJ's Findings and Order and remanded the case. The Appeals Board, after reviewing the petition and answer, determined that the petition for reconsideration was filed against a non-final, interlocutory order. Citing Labor Code sections and established precedent regarding finality of orders, the Board concluded that such orders do not determine substantive rights or liabilities and are not subject to reconsideration. Consequently, the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration was dismissed.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.