Home/Case Law/CHARLES D. PINEDA vs. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD, SEDGWICK CLAIMS SERVICES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular Decision

CHARLES D. PINEDA vs. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD, SEDGWICK CLAIMS SERVICES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Dec 26, 2008
ADJ422850 (RDG 0119112) ADJ1486375 (RDG 0119113)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petitions for reconsideration and removal, finding no final order was issued that would permit reconsideration, and the applicant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm for removal. The WCAB will return the case to the trial level for a hearing on the defendant's petition to declare the applicant a vexatious litigant, as the applicant appears to be repeatedly relitigating issues and filing unmeritorious motions. The WCJ will then proceed with the trial if appropriate after determining the vexatious litigant status.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petitions for reconsideration and removal, finding no final order was issued that would permit reconsideration, and the applicant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm for removal. The WCAB will return the case to the trial level for a hearing on the defendant's petition to declare the applicant a vexatious litigant, as the applicant appears to be repeatedly relitigating issues and filing unmeritorious motions. The WCJ will then proceed with the trial if appropriate after determining the vexatious litigant status.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.