CompFox AI Summary
In this workers' compensation case, the applicant initially stipulated to a lower average weekly wage, which the Board found to be a final determination that could not be revisited due to lack of good cause and the five-year statute of limitations. The Board affirmed the employer's credit for payments made to the Employment Development Department (EDD) to prevent double recovery. Furthermore, the Board found no unreasonable delay by the employer in payments to EDD, thus denying the applicant's penalty claim. Finally, the Board rescinded the order requiring the applicant's attorney to repay fees voluntarily paid by EDD, as such repayment was not mandated by law.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In this workers' compensation case, the applicant initially stipulated to a lower average weekly wage, which the Board found to be a final determination that could not be revisited due to lack of good cause and the five-year statute of limitations. The Board affirmed the employer's credit for payments made to the Employment Development Department (EDD) to prevent double recovery. Furthermore, the Board found no unreasonable delay by the employer in payments to EDD, thus denying the applicant's penalty claim. Finally, the Board rescinded the order requiring the applicant's attorney to repay fees voluntarily paid by EDD, as such repayment was not mandated by law.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.