Home/Case Law/CHERYL BOND-DICKEY vs. LAW OFFICE OF SATIN & RUSSELL, SCIF INSURED SANTA ANA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CHERYL BOND-DICKEY vs. LAW OFFICE OF SATIN & RUSSELL, SCIF INSURED SANTA ANA

Filed: Jul 02, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ1966312 (AHM 0071600)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a finding of 100% permanent disability for a paralegal/file clerk who sustained an industrial injury. The defendant argued the vocational expert's evaluation was insufficient. However, the Appeals Board denied reconsideration, finding the defendant failed to request further vocational evaluation at trial or provide rebuttal evidence. The Board also noted the defendant's petition lacked the specific detail and record references required by regulation.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a finding of 100% permanent disability for a paralegal/file clerk who sustained an industrial injury. The defendant argued the vocational expert's evaluation was insufficient. However, the Appeals Board denied reconsideration, finding the defendant failed to request further vocational evaluation at trial or provide rebuttal evidence. The Board also noted the defendant's petition lacked the specific detail and record references required by regulation.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.