Home/Case Law/CHESTER HODGE vs. DIMARE FRESH, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CHESTER HODGE vs. DIMARE FRESH, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jan 14, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ3166685

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board denied SCIF's petition for reconsideration regarding attorney fees. SCIF paid out all withheld funds before reconsideration was complete, accepting the risk of a later fee increase.

CHESTER HODGE vs. DIMARE FRESH, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board denied SCIF's petition for reconsideration regarding attorney fees. SCIF paid out all withheld funds before reconsideration was complete, accepting the risk of a later fee increase.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CHESTER HODGE vs. DIMARE FRESH, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CHESTER HODGE vs. DIMARE FRESH, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CHESTER HODGE vs. DIMARE FRESH, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

CHESTER HODGE vs. DIMARE FRESH, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.