Home/Case Law/CHEYANNE MORENO vs. CALSELECT INSURANCE SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

CHEYANNE MORENO vs. CALSELECT INSURANCE SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jul 25, 2025
San Bernadino
ADJ12744384

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a Findings and Order (F&O) issued on April 9, 2021. The F&O found that the applicant, Cheyanne Moreno, did not sustain a psychiatric injury due to a sudden and extraordinary event, thereby not qualifying for an exception to the six-month employment requirement of Labor Code section 3208.3(d). The WCAB determined that the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) erroneously misassigned the burden of proof regarding the six-month employment period to the applicant. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the F&O and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings to properly develop the record on whether the defendant can establish that the applicant's employment period was less than six months.

CHEYANNE MORENO vs. CALSELECT INSURANCE SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Bernadino. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Bernadino.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a Findings and Order (F&O) issued on April 9, 2021. The F&O found that the applicant, Cheyanne Moreno, did not sustain a psychiatric injury due to a sudden and extraordinary event, thereby not qualifying for an exception to the six-month employment requirement of Labor Code section 3208.3(d). The WCAB determined that the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) erroneously misassigned the burden of proof regarding the six-month employment period to the applicant. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the F&O and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings to properly develop the record on whether the defendant can establish that the applicant's employment period was less than six months.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CHEYANNE MORENO vs. CALSELECT INSURANCE SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Bernadino. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CHEYANNE MORENO vs. CALSELECT INSURANCE SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Bernadino. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CHEYANNE MORENO vs. CALSELECT INSURANCE SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

CHEYANNE MORENO vs. CALSELECT INSURANCE SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Bernadino. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.