Home/Case Law/CHOLAMALI ROSHANDELL vs. SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular Decision

CHOLAMALI ROSHANDELL vs. SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Oct 16, 2012
Riverside
ADJ1631280 (SJO 0254770)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration. This was because a petition for reconsideration can only be filed from a "final" order that determines substantive rights or liabilities, not interlocutory procedural or evidentiary decisions. The Board also denied the petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm as required by regulation. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was dismissed, and removal was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration. This was because a petition for reconsideration can only be filed from a "final" order that determines substantive rights or liabilities, not interlocutory procedural or evidentiary decisions. The Board also denied the petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm as required by regulation. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was dismissed, and removal was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.