Home/Case Law/CHRIS BOTSKO vs. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

CHRIS BOTSKO vs. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

Filed: May 10, 2019
Van Nuys
ADJ8775068

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Southern California Edison's petition for removal, which sought to prevent a supplemental medical report. Edison argued this would cause irreparable harm through increased expenses and delays. The Board found Edison failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, noting that utilizing an existing QME is a standard method to develop the medical record. Therefore, removal was deemed an inappropriate remedy.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Southern California Edison's petition for removal, which sought to prevent a supplemental medical report. Edison argued this would cause irreparable harm through increased expenses and delays. The Board found Edison failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, noting that utilizing an existing QME is a standard method to develop the medical record. Therefore, removal was deemed an inappropriate remedy.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.