Home/Case Law/CINDY PIERCE PALMER vs. CANINE CAROUSEL, STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

CINDY PIERCE PALMER vs. CANINE CAROUSEL, STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY

Filed: Mar 06, 2014
San Francisco
ADJ399293 (AHM 0126172)

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Removal as moot because she attended the scheduled medical evaluation despite her objections. Applicant argued the evaluation was improper due to alleged procedural defects, but the Board found her petition untimely and her claims unsubstantiated by current law. Furthermore, the injury predated a relevant statutory amendment, making the applicant's procedural objections inapplicable. Therefore, the petition seeking to rescind the order compelling attendance was dismissed.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Removal as moot because she attended the scheduled medical evaluation despite her objections. Applicant argued the evaluation was improper due to alleged procedural defects, but the Board found her petition untimely and her claims unsubstantiated by current law. Furthermore, the injury predated a relevant statutory amendment, making the applicant's procedural objections inapplicable. Therefore, the petition seeking to rescind the order compelling attendance was dismissed.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.