CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board held that amendments to Labor Code section 4646, permitting settlement of prospective vocational rehabilitation services, are substantive and not procedural. Therefore, they cannot be applied retrospectively to injuries sustained before the amendment's effective date of January 1, 2003, absent clear legislative intent to the contrary.
Clarence A. Pebworth vs. Allan Hancock College, Workers' Compensation Administrators is a workers' compensation case decided in MISSING. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in MISSING.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board held that amendments to Labor Code section 4646, permitting settlement of prospective vocational rehabilitation services, are substantive and not procedural. Therefore, they cannot be applied retrospectively to injuries sustained before the amendment's effective date of January 1, 2003, absent clear legislative intent to the contrary.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.