CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns a lien claimant, Michael Kesselman, seeking payment for psyche-related treatment. Kesselman argues he has standing because his bills weren't fully covered by the applicant's health insurer, and he disputes the prior finding of no industrial psyche injury. The Board granted reconsideration, clarifying that a prior unappealed award determined no industrial psyche injury occurred. Consequently, Kesselman's lien for psyche treatment cannot be recovered as it was not reasonably required to cure an industrial injury.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns a lien claimant, Michael Kesselman, seeking payment for psyche-related treatment. Kesselman argues he has standing because his bills weren't fully covered by the applicant's health insurer, and he disputes the prior finding of no industrial psyche injury. The Board granted reconsideration, clarifying that a prior unappealed award determined no industrial psyche injury occurred. Consequently, Kesselman's lien for psyche treatment cannot be recovered as it was not reasonably required to cure an industrial injury.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.