CompFox AI Summary
Applicant Colin McKenzie sought reconsideration of a decision that rejected his workers' compensation claim for prostate cancer. The applicant argued the cancer presumption under Labor Code 3212.1 was improperly rebutted. The Agreed Medical Examiner, Dr. Stewart, concluded the presumption was rebutted, finding no reasonable link between the applicant's work exposures and his cancer based on extensive studies. The judge agreed with Dr. Stewart's analysis and recommended the Petition for Reconsideration be denied. However, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to further study the factual and legal issues.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Applicant Colin McKenzie sought reconsideration of a decision that rejected his workers' compensation claim for prostate cancer. The applicant argued the cancer presumption under Labor Code 3212.1 was improperly rebutted. The Agreed Medical Examiner, Dr. Stewart, concluded the presumption was rebutted, finding no reasonable link between the applicant's work exposures and his cancer based on extensive studies. The judge agreed with Dr. Stewart's analysis and recommended the Petition for Reconsideration be denied. However, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to further study the factual and legal issues.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.