Home/Case Law/CRESENCIO BARRERA vs. HNR FRAMING, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CRESENCIO BARRERA vs. HNR FRAMING, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: May 06, 2008
San Francisco
SDO 313688

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded a prior decision because the administrative law judge (WCJ) failed to apply the Kunz standard for determining reasonable facility fees for medical services. The WCJ's decision was found to be internally inconsistent and unsupported by the evidence, particularly regarding the consideration of contractually negotiated rates and usual fees accepted by other providers. The case is remanded for further proceedings and a new decision by a different WCJ.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded a prior decision because the administrative law judge (WCJ) failed to apply the Kunz standard for determining reasonable facility fees for medical services. The WCJ's decision was found to be internally inconsistent and unsupported by the evidence, particularly regarding the consideration of contractually negotiated rates and usual fees accepted by other providers. The case is remanded for further proceedings and a new decision by a different WCJ.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.