Home/Case Law/CRIS ARANDA vs. MORTIMER & WALLACE, INC., UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND, STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, ICW GROUP INSURANCE COMPANIES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CRIS ARANDA vs. MORTIMER & WALLACE, INC., UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND, STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, ICW GROUP INSURANCE COMPANIES

Filed: Jun 18, 2015
Van Nuys
ADJ9687683

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the employer's petition for reconsideration, rescinding the prior order that required reimbursement for applicant's deposition costs. The Board found that the employer was denied due process as they received no notice or opportunity to be heard before the order was issued. The case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings, allowing the employer to present arguments regarding alleged fraudulent statements made by the applicant during the deposition. This is permissible when the alleged deceit directly concerns the claim of injury itself.

CRIS ARANDA vs. MORTIMER & WALLACE, INC., UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND, STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, ICW GROUP INSURANCE COMPANIES is a workers' compensation case decided in Van Nuys. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Van Nuys.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the employer's petition for reconsideration, rescinding the prior order that required reimbursement for applicant's deposition costs. The Board found that the employer was denied due process as they received no notice or opportunity to be heard before the order was issued. The case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings, allowing the employer to present arguments regarding alleged fraudulent statements made by the applicant during the deposition. This is permissible when the alleged deceit directly concerns the claim of injury itself.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CRIS ARANDA vs. MORTIMER & WALLACE, INC., UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND, STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, ICW GROUP INSURANCE COMPANIES workers compensation case in Van Nuys. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CRIS ARANDA vs. MORTIMER & WALLACE, INC., UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND, STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, ICW GROUP INSURANCE COMPANIES case law summary from Van Nuys. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CRIS ARANDA vs. MORTIMER & WALLACE, INC., UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND, STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, ICW GROUP INSURANCE COMPANIES Case Analysis

CRIS ARANDA vs. MORTIMER & WALLACE, INC., UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND, STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, ICW GROUP INSURANCE COMPANIES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Van Nuys. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.